1. The defendant has to the plaintiffs each money stated in the attached Table 1's "amount of personal seal" and as to the money, from November 1, 2016 to November 2017.

1. Details of ruling;

(a) Project approval and announcement 1) Project approval: A public announcement of G development project: The Defendant; (a) H 3 project implementer public announcement at the Jinju on May 12, 2016:

B. Land subject to expropriation by the local Land Tribunal of Gyeongnam-do on September 7, 2016: Land listed in the separate sheet No. 2 list owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “each land of this case”).

(2) Compensation for losses on October 31, 2016: An appraisal corporation: Sam Chang Chang and one appraisal corporation; and one appraisal corporation.

C. The Central Land Expropriation Committee’s objection No. 1 on March 23, 2017: Compensation for losses: as indicated in the “amount of personal adjudication” as indicated in the attached Table 2: 2) An appraisal corporation: Uniform Appraisal Corporation, a joint appraisal corporation, a joint appraisal corporation (hereinafter collectively referred to as “appraisal”) and a joint appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal”), and the result of the appraisal (hereinafter referred to as “appraisal”).

D. 1) Compensation for losses as a result of the court’s entrustment of appraisal: 2) appraiser: I (hereinafter referred to as “court appraiser”; hereinafter referred to as “court appraisal”)’s appraisal result; (a) there is no dispute over the facts that there is no dispute; (b) Gap’s entries of evidence Nos. 1 through 3, 1 and 2 (including serial numbers; hereinafter the same shall apply); the court’s entrustment of appraisal to appraiser I; and (c) the purport of the entire pleadings;

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiffs asserted that the appraisal of each of the lands of this case should be increased in accordance with the court's appraisal, since there is an error in the assessment of the compensation amount for each of the lands of this case, such as an error in the comparison of individual factors.

B. In a lawsuit concerning the increase or decrease of compensation for expropriation 1, each appraisal and appraisal based on the expropriation ruling are considered as having no illegality in the assessment methods, and as such, the remainder of the price assessment factors except for the comparison of goods, etc.