1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part concerning the Plaintiff A’s claim shall be dismissed.

2. The plaintiffs' claims except the plaintiff A.

1. Basic facts

A. Before being amended by Act No. 6656 of February 4, 2002, Japan-gu C for the purpose of improving the residential environment of low-income urban residents

c. Article 2(1) of the former Ad Hoc Measures Act

A) A residential environment improvement project district (hereinafter referred to as “instant project district”) pursuant to Article 3(1).

b. The Korea National Housing Corporation and the Korea Land Corporation are merged with the defendant on October 1, 2009, as Korea Land and Housing Corporation enters into force.

The defendant is "the defendant" regardless of whether he or she was before or after the merger.

On November 12, 2001, the Governor of the Gyeonggi-do approved the project plan for the construction of public rental housing for the instant project district, and the name was changed from the instant project district to the “D apartment” (E apartment) within the instant project district.

The apartment of this case is called "the apartment of this case".

(C) Around July 2006, the Defendant completed the instant apartment and completed the construction of the apartment around September 2006, and the Plaintiffs (However, F, G, and H are excluded from the Plaintiffs) from around September 2006.

The term "I, J, K, L, M, N,O, P, Q, R, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AB, AC, AD, AE, AF, AH, AI, AJ, AJ, AJ, AK, A andAL, AM, AM, AP, AP, Q Q, ASS, AS, ATS, AT, AU, AU, and AV, among the plaintiffs, are those who have purchased each apartment house from the preferential buyers, on the grounds that there is no difference between the preferential buyers, or the legal status of those who have acquired the right to claim the return of unjust enrichment claimed by the plaintiffs in this case."

The apartment of this case was leased for five years. D.

The Defendant announced the occupants to apply for conversion for sale in lots on or around September 201, when five years have elapsed since the period of lease of the apartment of this case, which is the mandatory period of the apartment of this case, arrives. The first buyer is the Defendant from September 201 to November 201.