1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff falling under the following order of payment shall be revoked.

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for dismissal or addition and deletion as mentioned below 2. Thus, this case is quoted by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Under the third list of the judgment of the court of first instance that is removed or added, the Defendant shall turn “D, E,” “D and E” into “D and E”.

Paragraph (1) and (2) shall be added after the “declaration” in the first sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance.

During the 7th judgment of the first instance court, the first to the 5th part of the 7th judgment is as follows.

It is difficult to conclude that the original defendant has a legal right to visit I without the consent of the plaintiff and the person with the authority to access and manage I even if he/she is in a prison relationship, and that the defendant does not necessarily have to visit the plaintiff, and that the defendant is not obliged to do so, and that the "private life" in the 7th 11 and 13th 7th 13th 1 of the judgment of the first instance court is regarded as "business activities or privacy."

The defendant, "the defendant," in the 16th sentence of the judgment of the first instance.

In the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term " only the fact of recognition of the fact of fact of fact" shall be as follows in the first to the fourth sentence of the same part.

In light of the fact that the Defendant did not confirm in the above 4th session, the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant directly participated in the above 38 session (as of June 7, 2017, June 13, 2017, July 6, 2017, and July 11, 2017), but it is difficult to conclude that the Defendant directly participated in the above 4th session, and on the contrary, there is no evidence to confirm which the Defendant had access to the 1st session, and what role in the 4th session was performed by the Defendant. In light of the above, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone, the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, alone, requires additional monetary payment and complaint.