logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2016.08.26 2016고단392
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal history] The Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Changwon District Court on March 16, 2010, and on May 2, 201, a summary order of KRW 2.5 million for the same crime at the Daejeon District Court on May 2, 201.

[2] On April 7, 2016, the Defendant driven an E-wheeled vehicle at a section of approximately 100 meters from the front of the office of 104 Amnestypon-si and the front road in C, while under the influence of alcohol by 0.102% of alcohol during blood, without obtaining a license for a bicycle for a light motor device device for light on April 7, 2016.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of alcohol and the driver's license register;

1. Previous convictions: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to inquire into criminal history, report on investigation (report on the result of confirmation of the previous convictions of the disposition and report on the date of release);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense, and Article 154 subparagraph 2 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) of the relevant Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62(1) has several records of punishment for the same type of power, but there is no record of punishment for drinking since 2011, and the crime of this case is less than the ordinary drinking and non-licenseless crime as a motor device bicycle rider, and the risk of the crime of this case is less than the ordinary drinking and non-licenseless crime, and no additional

Various sentencing conditions, such as the fact that the sentencing conditions are different, shall be considered)

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of protection observation, attendance order and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act or more;

arrow