1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: "The plaintiff was not served with a written ruling" of the 3rd judgment of the court of first instance as "related person", and the 6-9th judgment of the 6-9th judgment as "the reasons for not being served with a written ruling of the court of first instance was that the defendant Port Authority erroneously stated the plaintiff's address in the provisional attachment registration, not with the address of the plaintiff, but with the address of the 101-dong 2008, and thereby, it was served with the above erroneous address of the 104th judgment of the court of first instance". "The reasons for not served with a written ruling on the plaintiff was that the defendant Construction applied for a ruling of provisional attachment registration and the address of the 101-dong 2008 of the 3rd judgment of the court of first instance as the address of the plaintiff and that of the 101-dong Madong 208, which did not actually live with the plaintiff."

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.