logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2018.11.29 2016구합10416
영업정지처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

·Basic Facts

가. 원고의 지위 및 건설업의 등록기준 1) 원고는 1983. 6. 10. 설립되어 1998. 7. 27. 조경공사업을 등록하고, 2001. 7. 6. 토목건축공사업을 등록한 종합건설업체이다. 2) 자본금과 관련한 건설업의 등록기준으로 건설산업기본법 제10조, 같은 법 시행령 제13조 제1항 제1호 [별표 2]는 토목건축공사업은 12억 원 이상, 조경공사업은 7억 원 이상이라고 각 규정하고 있다.

B. On December 4, 2015, the Plaintiff reported the matters on the registration of a construction business on December 23, 2015. On December 23, 2015, B: (a) the Plaintiff reported the matters on the registration of a construction business; (b) on the basis of the results of the actual capital examination conducted in 2014, the Plaintiff submitted the Defendant’s opinion on the amount of short-term financial products KRW 2,720,445,00; (c) KRW 368,068,000; (d) the amount of construction accounts outstanding; (e) KRW 132,50,000; (e) the amount of development charges; (e) KRW 132,50,00; (f) the amount of prepaid expenses; (f) KRW 1,667,114; (f) KRW 132,50,00; and (f) KRW 360,000; and (f) the Plaintiff’s opinion on the amount of the reported 21501.

3) Ultimately, the Plaintiff’s total amount of capital on the financial statements of December 31, 2014 is not recognized as KRW 4,100,846,07; KRW 2,720,445,00 among the short-term financial instruments; KRW 10,472,727 among the outstanding construction amounts; KRW 119,60,00 among the outstanding construction amounts; KRW 132,50,000; KRW 5,578,448; KRW 1,67,114; KRW 2,870,63,289; KRW 230,182,718; and the Defendant’s actual capital in the year 2014 is presumed to be the premise of the instant disposition.

arrow