logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.09.25 2012가합514395
부당이득금
Text

1. The Defendants fall under each of the categories 1 and 2 of the attached Tables 2 and 1 and 2, respectively, to the pertinent Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The remainder of the Defendants except Defendant E.S. Construction and relocation measures are local governments, and the head of the local government becomes the project implementer and implemented the relevant public works specified in the attached Table 3 list. However, in this context, even if the contents refer to the head of the local government, who is the project implementer, the Plaintiff is only the relevant Defendant, who is the local government, for convenience. The pertinent public works specified in the attached Table 3 list, respectively, implemented (hereinafter collectively referred to as “instant

A) In the case of Plaintiff A, one of his husband, provided the Plaintiff’s property owned by B, and thereafter, B’s right to the relevant project implementer was inherited to the Plaintiff on August 6, 2006 due to the provision of the said housing, and thereafter died on August 6, 2006, and thereafter, B was inherited to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff’s residential building was offered to the Plaintiff for convenience. The Defendants, as indicated in the attached Table 3 List pursuant to the National Housing Special Supply Plan for the Defendant, provided that each of the relevant Plaintiff listed in the attached Table 3 (hereinafter “E”) to specially supply the apartment of the national housing scale to be constructed as described in paragraph 1 (b) below the National Housing Site Development Plan for the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C/D Housing Site Development (hereinafter “E”) from around 2003, the Special Rules on National Housing Supply for the removed Residents (Rules 305 and hereinafter “Special Supply Rules”).

(B) A request for special supply of national housing in the E zone was received from the Plaintiffs who are eligible to be supplied under Article 5. B. In the E zone designated as a housing site development district on December 6, 2002, Defendant SP Corporation constitutes the relevant public works listed in the attached Table 3 of the Housing Site Development Project, which included the details of new construction, lease, and sale of an apartment of national housing size (hereinafter “E zone apartment”) as follows:

arrow