logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.05.31 2012고단4597
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the defendants are individually from the date of this judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person who drives a business taxi for E.

Around 04:52 on October 30, 201, the Defendant driven the said vehicle as a business, and when the Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-ro 5 (Seoul Jongno-ro 5) drive the one-lane of 20-1 (20-1), from the 5-lane away from the 5-lane away, the Defendant was on the part of the Defendant’s vehicle, by neglecting his duty of care to accurately operate the front section and the right and the right and the right and the right and to prevent the accident, and by neglecting his duty of care to prevent the accident in advance.

The Defendant did not take measures such as aiding and abetting the victim while having the victim suffer an unexpected injury in the treatment days due to occupational negligence as above, but escaped.

2. Defendant B is a person who drives a G-type taxi.

On October 30, 201, 204:52 to 04:53, immediately after the shock accident under the above paragraph (1), the Defendant driven the said vehicle as his duties and proceeded with the two-lanes of the five-lanes of the Seoul Jongno-gu Seoul Jongno-ro 5, the front direction and the right of the front direction and the right of the front direction and the right of the front direction and the right of the front direction of the front direction and the right of the front direction of the front direction of the front direction of the front direction of the front direction of the front direction of the front direction of the front direction of the front direction of the front direction of the front direction of the front direction. However, the Defendant neglected to perform his duty of care to prevent the accident, and neglected to discover the victim F who was moved from the first direction to the second direction of the front direction and used in the front direction due to the shock of the above paragraph (1).

The Defendant did not take measures such as aiding and abetting the victim while having the victim suffer an unexpected injury in the treatment days due to occupational negligence as above, but escaped.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The entry of Defendant A in part of the first trial record.

arrow