1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The grounds for the plaintiff's claim are as shown in the attached Form.

The announcement price on the aggregate building register of the apartment of this case, which was owned by the deceased and the deceased, was 174 million won as of January 1, 2018, and the fact that the debtor C among the apartment of this case was 1/5 of the heir's shares in statutory inheritance as the heir among the apartment of this case is significant fact in this court.

C's shares are approximately 34,80,000 won ( = 17,400 ¡À5).

However, the joint security for general creditors has been reduced as a result by the debtor who had already been in excess of his/her obligation waives his/her right to inherited property in consultation on division of the inherited property.

Even if the result of the division of property is less than the degree corresponding to the specific share of inheritance, it shall not be revoked as a fraudulent act, and even if it is less than the degree corresponding to the specific share of inheritance, the scope of revocation as a fraudulent act shall be limited to the deficient part.

Here, the specific share of inheritance refers to the modification of the designated share of inheritance or statutory share of inheritance, if there is a special benefit (Article 1008 of the Civil Act) or a contributory portion (Article 1008-2(1) of the Civil Act) according to the above judgment.

C We examine the defendant's defenses about the specific shares of inheritance C.

을 제1 내지 8호증의 각 기재에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, 피고는 오랜 세월에 걸쳐서 모친에게 생활비를 꾸준히 지급하여 왔고, 반면에 맏이 C은 부모와 동생들로부터 상당한 경제적 지원을 받았었기에 C이 위 아파트의 자신의 상속지분을 받지 않기로 한 것이었는데 그 금전수령내역으로는 예컨대 C이 2010년 E로부터 여러 차례에 걸쳐서 합계 1,000만 원이 넘는 돈을 송금받았고, 피고로부터는 2009. 2. 27. 3,000만 원과 2010. 1. 6. 5,000만 원을 지급받은 사실을 인정할 수 있다....