logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원영월지원 2020.12.22 2020고단172
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On July 16, 2019, the Defendant driven a vehicle while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.151% at an influence area (hereinafter referred to as the “influence”) at the bar (hereinafter referred to as the “influence”) around 16, 201.

‘A summary order of KRW 9 million was issued on January 23, 2020 on the charge of the crime in the Gangseo branch court of the Chuncheon District Court.

In the case of the request for formal trial against the above summary order, the accused is led to confession of the facts charged.

On January 27, 2020, the Defendant driven CM5 vehicles without obtaining a driving license in the state of alcohol alcohol concentration of about 0.119% in the section of approximately 1km from the 1km to the front road located in the Yongsan-gu in the Yongsan-gu in the Yongsan-gu in Gangseo-gu, Suhyeong-gu, Gangwon-do.

As a result, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drunk driving more than twice, and at the same time, driven a vehicle without obtaining a driver's license.

2. The Defendant violated the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act operated CM5 vehicles, which were not covered by mandatory insurance, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

3. The Defendant in violation of the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in driving CMF5 vehicles.

Around 20:33 on January 27, 2020, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol as described in paragraph (1), proceeded at an insular speed as one-lane in the direction of the Yongsan-gun in front of the Gangseo-gun in the direction of the wouldporizontal tunnel.

At the same time, there was a center line at the center of the road and on the side of the road, so in such a case, there was a duty of care to observe the center line and to safely drive the vehicle so as not to conflict with the day.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and imprisoned the road side of the opposite opposite lane by neglecting the center line while under the influence of alcohol.

arrow