1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On August 12, 1981, the Plaintiff was discharged from military service on September 30, 1986 while serving as a naval noncommissioned officer.

B. On November 24, 2003, the Plaintiff applied for registration of a person of distinguished service to the Defendant on the ground that “Around May 1983, when serving in the military unit belonging to the intelligence company, was injured by the right bridge and lusium by satisfaction with the underwater erosion training during the underwater erosion training. Around July 1985, the Plaintiff received a sex surgery at an integrated hospital with the face of the exhaustr of the ship during the underwater erosion training,” and “A ebrate nuclear ebrate escape certificate (e.g., 5-T. 1), e.g., spine nuclear ebrate escape certificate (e., e.g., e., e., g., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e., e.,

C. On May 31, 2005, the Plaintiff suffered additional injury, and applied for recognition of additional injury to the Defendant. On April 11, 2006, at the Veterans Examination Committee of the Republic of Korea on April 11, 2006, the “protruding of conical signboards between 2-3, 4-5, and 6-7 of the Gyeong-3, 4-5, and 6-7 of the Gyeongsan, the escape certificate of conical signboards between 5-2, the escape certificate between 5-00, the right-side reconstition of the front line, and the structural loss outside upper dub,” was recognized as an additional difference, but was judged below the rating criteria of the rating classification

On February 14, 2008, the Plaintiff filed an additional application for recognition of military merit (application for registration) with the Defendant on the ground that the “unexplic mental disorder, and stress disorder in external illness” occurred during the performance of military duties. However, on January 15, 2009, at the Veterans Examination Committee of the Republic of Korea on January 15, 2009, there was no specific and objective supporting material to verify that the disease occurred in connection with the performance of military duties, and at the time of the medical advice of the Republic of Korea, it is difficult to recognize the disease as a disease related to military duties in general in the event that there is no special external trauma in connection with military duties due to congenital diseases.”

E. On July 23, 2013, the Plaintiff re-verifications the Defendant on the “scopic, urine, right check, and mental disorder (e.g., incopic mental disorder, external stress disorder).”