logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.02.06 2014누4780
토지수용보상금증액
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this case is as follows, except for the addition or modification as follows, the court cites this case as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In the first instance court, 4 pages 5 and 5 pages 15-16, each "this court" shall be changed to "the first instance court".

At the bottom of the same four pages, the second parallel “public notice” was added to the following “(However, each land of this case is the land whose specific use area is changed for the direct purpose of the implementation of the relevant public works, so it shall be assessed on the basis of the specific use area, etc. before the change is made pursuant to Article 23(2) of the Enforcement Rule of the Act on Acquisition of and Compensation for Land, etc. for Public Works (hereinafter “Public Works Act”) as follows:

The "other factors" of the same six pages 17 and 7 pages 19,20 shall be changed to each "other conditions".

2. If so, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed in entirety.

arrow