logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.06.14 2017나80400
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court is that the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “the plaintiff and the defendant received 85 points at a comprehensive square point of 85 points or more,” and the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, “Seoul High Court 2016Nu38435,” which included “Seoul High Court 2016Nu38435,” and the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for adding Gap evidence 18 to “the ground for recognition” as stated in the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, this part is cited as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The plaintiff's assertion and judgment

A. The Defendant asserted that the Plaintiff’s primary business is supervision, and was designated as a supervisor of the instant construction project by intentionally stating supervision results by intentionally knowing the details of the instant criteria and public announcements. Accordingly, the Plaintiff was not designated as a supervisor. As such, the Defendant was liable for damages incurred by the Defendant due to the Defendant’s failure to obtain revenues from supervision during the period for which supervision was performed. As such, the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages incurred by the tort, and the Defendant primarily conducts supervision of the instant construction project from May 1, 2015 to August 31, 2016 (the Defendant: (a) KRW 1,219,281,632 x KRW 10.6% of the net profit rate of the Defendant in 2015; (b) KRW 1,219,281,632 x KRW 10.6% of the supervision fees that the Defendant received from e.g., from e., 1986).

B. The reasoning for this part of the judgment is that the court is based on No. 6 of the judgment of the court of first instance, No. 20, and that the parties to the legal dispute seek a final settlement of the dispute to the court is related to the foundation of the rule of law.

arrow