1. We dismiss the part of the instant lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of drawings.

2. The plaintiff's remaining claims are dismissed.

3...

The summary of the case is the case that the defendant prepares an appraisal map according to the court's entrustment of survey appraisal and claims that the attached drawing, which forms the basis of the judgment, is a false drawing that the building owned by the plaintiff occupies part of the land owned by the plaintiff and that the plaintiff seeks confirmation of invalidity of the attached drawing and preparation and delivery of the corrected authentic drawing, against the defendant.

In fact, the premise B is the owner of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 50 square meters, and the Plaintiff is the owner of D large scale 612 square meters and its ground building.

B, on March 22, 2010, asserting that the Plaintiff’s building is in possession of part of its own site, and filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff, as Seoul Central District Court 2010da103435, such as land transfer, etc.

In the above lawsuit, the court entrusted the defendant to the Jongno-gu branch of Jongno-gu branch, and accordingly, conducted a survey of cadastral status in the above branch, and prepared and submitted the attached drawing as an appraisal.

Attached Form

According to the drawings, among the land B, the part on the ship (B) which connects each point of 13, 14, 15, 16, 9, 8, 13 in sequence among the items indicated in the annexed drawings and the part (C) which connects each point of 17, 3, 19, 18, 17 in sequence on the part (C) of the attached drawings and the part of the attached drawings on the part (B) which connects each point of 4m2.

On June 30, 2011, the above court rendered a judgment ordering B to remove part of above ground stairs and buildings on the ground (B), part (c) above ground (B), together with the part (B), the court rejected the Plaintiff’s claim on the ground that the Plaintiff’s claim for delivery of part (A) of 16 square meters in sequence of each of the items (B), which is identical with that of the Seoul Central District Court No. 2009Na1030, Seoul Central District Court No. 2011 or 3289, as shown in the separate sheet No. 1, 2, 17, 18, 19, 4, 5, 12, 11, 10, 9, 16, 15, 14, 13, 13, and 16 square meters in line with the part (B) above).