The judgment below

Among the defendant cases against the defendant A, each crime of the 2018 Godan187, 2018 Godan1558 decided by the court below.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. As to Defendant A1’s fraud against the victim G, the victim G lent KRW 300 million to the Defendant as a share acquisition fund, knowing well the fact that Defendant A intended to take over the part of the H corporation’s rearrangement project from AS, and the Defendant also lent KRW 20 million and KRW 5 million, which he received in May 23, 2016 and June 3, 2016, as well as KRW 20 million and KRW 5 million, which he received in June 3, 2016, to the Defendant by investing in the child’s toy rental business, etc., while knowing the financial condition that the Defendant is not good, so the Defendant did not deceive the victim as stated in the facts charged, and did not have any intention to defraud.

B) As to the fraud against the victim P and T, Defendant A was not related to the above company, and the above victims transferred money to the above company's account also to the above victims' account, and the defendant is not money borrowed with the intent of defraudation; c) the victim U deposited 9.2 million won in the account of the victim U for the fraud against the victim U.S. as a shareholder. When the above company attempted to take over corporation V, it was returned part of KRW 37 million which the above company was paid to the above company. In the case of KRW 27.5 million which was remitted to the victim around July 12, 2016, the victim introduced that the defendant would invest Y corporation with the victim, and the defendant did not have taken over the above money by deceiving the victim, but the defendant did not have taken over the victim's shares from the victim, but did not have taken over the victim's shares.