Text
Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive against Defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B On June 21, 2011, the Cheongju District Court was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor and two years of suspended execution due to fraud, etc. in the Cheongju District Court Assistance, and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 29, 2011.
1. On October 2009, the Defendants’ co-offendered with Defendant A’s mind that Defendant A, while carrying out the interior work of the office of the Hanju-si F Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”), Defendant G managing F and H obtained from the victims by deceiving the victim G and H.
In the F Office on December 2009, the Defendants falsely stated, “If our country purchased the land I at the time of industrialization and prepares for the construction of a factory, and the F Corporation transferred the F Corporation, the Defendants would pay the interest on the loan that 120 million won for the acquisition of the corporation and the victims were to establish the corporation within five months after receiving the investment money for the construction of the factory, and then make the G to pay KRW 2.5 million monthly wage to G after counting it as the registration director.”
However, in fact, the Defendants did not own their own assets and did not purchase the above factory site, so even if they acquired the F corporation, they did not have the intent or ability to pay the victims the amount, such as the acquisition price of the corporation.
Nevertheless, the Defendants deceiving the victims as such and delivered documents such as corporate directors, corporate cards, and articles of incorporation at the F Office around January 12, 2010, and transferred F Corporation at the F Office around January 28, 2010, and Defendant A completed the registration as the representative director on the same day.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to induce victims, thereby deceiving the corporations of 120 million won or more.
2. The prosecutor of the crime committed by Defendant B prosecuted this part of the facts charged as a criminal act by conspiracy of the Defendants, but found Defendant A not guilty of this part of the facts charged as follows. The prosecutor found Defendant B as a sole criminal act.
Defendant
B For purposes of this subsection,