Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

Part of the facts charged was revised to the extent that it does not disadvantage the defendant's right of defense.

On May 16, 2017, from around 15:02 to 16:50 on the same day, the Defendant conducted one man-person demonstration using a scam, Picket stating the following: “A hospital agreed to do so by false words,” and “I have agreed to do so free of charge at the lifelong hospital expenses,” before the entrance of the c hospital (affiliated D) located in Seo-gu Busan, Seo-gu.

However, there was no fact that the defendant stated in the above saves and saves.

As a result, the Defendant, by openly pointing out false facts, damaged the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts, from that time up to January 30, 2018, the date and time of the crime as shown in the attached Table 1 and 2, and at the place of the crime, thereby impairing the honor of the victim by openly pointing out false facts at a total of 153 times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Statement of the police statement of E;

1. A copy of each judgment;

1. Receipt of a report on a civil petition for one demonstration, and a report on tracing a one-person demonstration by entering each hospital;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a copy of receipt of medical expenses;

1. Relevant Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant asserts that all the contents written on the diskettes or banner as stated in the facts constituting a crime are true.

The facts recognized in the judgment of a civil case related to a criminal trial are valuable materials for recognition.

According to the evidence duly examined by this court, the defendant is responsible for medical malpractice as to the school juristic person D and the defendant operating C Hospital as Busan District Court 201Gahap26431, 2012Gahap17885.