beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On May 18, 2014, at around 13:30, the Defendant driven a B-ro taxi with blood alcohol content of about 0.074% at around 5km from the front road located in the Southern-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, or from around 14:25 on the same day, from the front road to the Seowon Village D-ri, Nam-gu, Seowon-si, Nam-gu, Seognam-si.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the report on circumstantial statements of a drinking driver, notification of the results of crackdown on drinking driving, and inquiry of the facts of crackdown on drinking driving;
1. Relevant Article of the Act on the Crime and Articles 148-2 (2) 3 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, which choose the penalty for the crime;
1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he had been punished two times by a fine due to driving under the same kind of crime in around 2001 and around 2008, and he committed the crime of this case without being aware of the fact that he committed the crime of this case. In relation to driving under the influence of alcohol in this case, the degree of the criminal defendant's taking advantage of his behavior is relatively high to 0.074%. One of the criminal records before the driving under the influence of alcohol in this case is relatively old to 2001, one of the criminal records before the driving under the influence of alcohol in this case is a relatively old to 201, and the defendant is likely to be economically difficult and economically difficult. In particular, the sentence shall be determined by taking into account all the circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the arguments in this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, motive and circumstance of the crime