A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

Around August 194, the Defendant came to know of the Victim C (year 51) who is the U-Nam-nam, and came to have a sexual relationship for about one to two years, and left home without any contact, and left home around 2003, the Defendant her husband left home with economic difficulties because of his her her her her her husband’s her her husband, thereby raising money by taking advantage of the fact that the victim was a high school teacher.

On October 2005, the Defendant: (a) discovered the cell phone number of the victim through the school where the victim works, and (b) made the phone call to the victim, and (c) made the phone call to the victim; and (d) made it possible for the victim to compensate for the responsibility for the divorce, and (e) made the personal and sexual intercourse to the Office of Education.On the other hand, the Defendant made intimidation to the Office of Education to “I know about theme to be buried in the educational community, and send money to the four abilities.”

If the defendant does not send money to the office of education, the victim, who was frighted to the defendant's attitude, such as the fact of sexual intercourse with the victim, transferred five million won to the bank account (Account Number F) in the name of the defendant, known to the defendant on October 17, 2005.

In addition, the Defendant, from that time until June 7, 2006, by threatening the Office of Education and schools to make a width to the fact of sexual relations if the Defendant would not give money to the victim as shown in the list of crimes attached hereto, thereby passing up to a total of 52 million won from the food victim about six times. Around January 6, 2007, the Defendant attempted to go up to the Defendant by sending the victim a phone to the Office of Education for a total of 10 million won. On the other hand, on the part of the victim around January 15, 2007, the Defendant sent the phone to the Office of Education. On the other hand, the Defendant sent the phone as soon as possible. On January 15, 2006, the Defendant would directly enter the Office of Education to sit, and sent it in accordance with 100 million won as soon as possible. However, the victim attempted to bring up 100 million won.