1. The defendant's KRW 20,000,00 and about this, 5% per annum from July 25, 2020 to January 28, 2021 to the plaintiff.

Facts of recognition

The plaintiff is a married couple who completed the marriage report on October 8, 2009 and C, and has two children.

Since October 2019, the Defendant provided Kakao Stockholm messages with knowledge that C is a spouse, and provided them with an overseas trip or love, or created and operated SNS account with knowledge that C is a spouse.

[The grounds for recognition] The act of causing mental distress to the spouse by a third party of the legal principles related to judgment as to the overall purport of the theory of claim and changes stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 11, 13 and the whole purport of the theory of claim by either side of the married couple, thereby infringing on the common life of the married couple or impeding their maintenance and the spouse's rights as the spouse, and thereby infringing on the spouse's rights as the spouse, constitutes a tort in principle (see Supreme Court Decision 2011Meu 2997, Nov. 20, 2014, etc.). In this case, the term "unlawful act" is a broad concept that includes adultery, but does not reach the adultery, but includes any unlawful act that does not faithfully with the marital duty. Whether it is an unlawful act shall be evaluated in consideration of the degree and circumstances of the specific case, and in light of the aforementioned legal principles as seen earlier, the defendant's establishment of a tort and the purport of the whole judgment as to public health damage liability in C, as a whole, in light of the aforementioned legal principles.

In addition, the defendant's improper act is a tort that infringes upon the plaintiff's spouse's right as the plaintiff's spouse while interfering with the maintenance of the plaintiff's community life or the plaintiff's spouse's right, and thus, the plaintiff suffered considerable mental suffering. Thus, the defendant suffered mental suffering.