All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to the Defendant’s grounds of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court was justifiable to have found the Defendant guilty on the grounds indicated in its reasoning, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules

2. According to the reasoning of the lower judgment on the grounds of appeal by the prosecutor, the lower court, on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning, acquitted the Defendant on the ground that the Defendants’ respective possession of documents and books posted by the prosecutor’s grounds of appeal on the instant charges constituted a case where there is no proof of crime.

The judgment below

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the above determination by the court below is just and acceptable. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by exceeding the bounds of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against logical and empirical rules, or by misapprehending the legal principles

3. All appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.