1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is an organization in charge of the affairs related to industry-academia-research cooperation established pursuant to the Industrial Education Enhancement and Industry-Academia-Research Cooperation Promotion Act, which is the subject of the vocational ability development project under the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers. On September 14, 2010, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement with the Human Resources Development Service of Korea (hereinafter “Corporation”) and started a national human resources development conference project by establishing a human resources development conference center under the Plaintiff’s control from January 1, 201.

B. The Plaintiff, pursuant to the Act on the Development of Workplace Skills of Workers, may request the Corporation to pay training expenses, if the employees of the Convention Company are present at least 80% of the total training hours and meet the completion requirements after obtaining approval for a business plan for a consortium training from the Defendant and concluding a consortium training agreement with the Convention Company.

C. However, as a result of the Defendant’s special guidance and supervision on the 17 national human resources development conference training conducted in the year 2012 and 2013, it was confirmed that the Plaintiff conducted such unlawful training as reporting the Plaintiff’s performance of training (a false report is made after conducting the training course different from the reported process), processing false attendance (a subsequent signature by the training participant), and manipulating the training time (a subsequent signature by the training participant) by reporting that the training was completed even if the training was conducted less than 80% of the scheduled training hours, and the supply and demand of training fees and this part of the violation type hereinafter referred to as “instant violation type”).

Accordingly, on April 8, 2014, the defendant requested the police to investigate the plaintiff's revocation of the revocation of the nine major courses and the restriction on the entrustment of the whole course. On March 4, 2015, the defendant finally requested the plaintiff's 17 training courses to investigate it. 825,473,064 won, such as the cancellation of recognition, restriction on recognition of the whole training courses, and the amount of illegal receipt of the training courses.