Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

D Around June 2010, a person who was elected as a Si Council member of the E-Si(F, G, and H) of the Ansan-si(F, G, and H) and is in office I (the B-Si Council of Ansan-si shall have the authority to inspect and investigate administrative affairs, such as the enactment and revision of the Ordinance of Ansan-si, deliberation and resolution of the budget, approval of the budget, acceptance and handling of petitions, etc., and related public officials may attend the Council and ask questions and request necessary materials. In addition, in a case, a person who is in a position to visit the site and investigate and verify facts and request necessary measures, and is in a position to exercise de facto influence on the performance of affairs handled by public officials of Ansan-si, and the defendant is the same as D.

D In February 2012, at the "M" store operated by the Defendant, which is located in Annsan-si L in Annsan-si, Annsan-si L, the Defendant heard from the Defendant that “the occupation in Korea is highly likely to cause an accident (the delivery accident), the retirement age is guaranteed, and the Defendant wishes to seek another occupation that has no risk of an accident,” and “I wish to apply for the employment examination for a street cleaners in Annsan-si,” and on March 2012, at the same place as the first police officer, the Defendant “We need to participate in a competition for the employment of a street cleaners.” In order to pass a month, 30 million won is required to pass it, and 30 million won is required to pass it, and it was necessary to go against a public official in charge of employment.

At around 12:00 on March 14, 2012, the Defendant offered KRW 30 million to the street cleaners upon soliciting the relevant public officials to be employed by D at the office of the Council D of Ansan-si Council D, Ansan-si, the members of Ansan-si.

Accordingly, the defendant has given D a bribe under the pretext of arranging matters belonging to other public officials' duties by taking advantage of his status as a public official.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The witness D.