logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2021.01.27 2020고정1615
협박
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 17:08 on June 18, 2020, the Defendant was driving a “C” route cruise vehicle in front of Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and left-hand turn to D. On the other hand, the Defendant was a driver in front of the “F” cattle or other vehicle driven in the same direction on the second lane by the victim E (38 Does) who was driving in the same direction.

Accordingly, the defendant is the driver's seat of the victim with the driver's seat on the part of the victim, and the victim refers to the victim. "Woo-hack knb, such as a kbbbb kbb.

“Along with a large amount of care, the victim was threatened by taking an attitude that would inflict any harm on the body of the victim by placing the victim’s driver’s seat windows on a variety of occasions, forcing the driver’s seat doors into force, etc., thereby threatening the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal affairs in the E-statement (Analysis of video images of black boxes);

1. Relevant Article 283 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Although it is recognized that there is no record of the same kind of crime for the reason of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the fact that there is no record of the crime committed by this type of crime, and the nature of the crime is not good in light of the method and content of the crime in this case. In addition, considering the motive and circumstance of the crime in this case, circumstances after the crime, age, sexual behavior, economic situation, etc., it cannot be deemed that the fine of the summary order is excessive.

arrow