The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In light of the summary of the grounds for appeal in this case’s sentencing conditions, the lower court’s punishment against the Defendant (a fine of KRW 300,000) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the judgment, the Defendant was the first offender, and there are some circumstances to consider the circumstances leading to the instant crime, and the Defendant recognized all of the instant crimes, etc., which are favorable to the Defendant.

On the other hand, however, when the payment of execution expenses that the defendant requested to the council of occupants' representatives was suspended, the defendant committed the crime in this case, and the nature of the crime is not good, the Commission has determined the punishment by fully considering the circumstances favorable to the defendant, and there is no change of circumstances that the judgment of the court below and the punishment are different from the judgment of the court below at the time of the trial, and other various sentencing conditions that are shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, happy family environment, and circumstances before and after the crime, the defendant's punishment against the defendant is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.