1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant B: (a) on each real estate listed in the separate sheet, the Gwangju District Court Naju Registry on February 2012.

1. The facts constituting the grounds for the attachment of the facts of recognition do not conflict between the Plaintiff, Defendant C, and D, and the Plaintiff, Defendant B, E, and F pursuant to the main sentence of Article 150(3) of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. According to the above findings of the determination, the registration of the establishment of a neighboring mortgage completed on February 16, 2012 by Defendant B as the receipt No. 4289 on each real estate listed in the separate sheet was extinguished.

As such, Defendant B is obligated to implement the procedure for registration of cancellation of the registration of the establishment of the above neighboring mortgage, and Defendant C, D, E, and F, who is the provisional attachment or execution creditor, are obligated to express their consent to the registration of cancellation of the establishment of the above neighboring mortgage.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's respective claims are justified, and all of them are accepted, and the costs of lawsuit are assessed against each party in accordance with Article 99 of the Civil Procedure Act in consideration of the grounds for cancellation of the above secured claim, the defendants' response form, etc., and they are so decided as per Disposition.