Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

1. The defendant who violated the Building Act related to the non-establishment of a retaining wall is the contractor of a newly built multi-household house in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and the contractor of a construction work shall install a retaining wall or take other necessary measures in order to create a site on land likely to damage;

Nevertheless, on June 19, 2017, the Defendant newly built a site without installing a retaining wall, such as a retaining wall at the site of a new construction project and a soil plate, or taking other necessary measures.

2. The defendant in violation of the Building Act related to the request for reconstruction or correction by a supervisor of construction works is the constructor of the construction works for multi-household housing, and the supervisor of construction works is the supervisor of the construction works for multi-household housing; the supervisor of construction works is the supervisor of the construction works for multi-household housing; the supervisor of construction works is required to discover any violation of the Building Act, any order or disposition under this Act, other relevant Acts and subordinate statutes, and any other relevant Acts and subordinate statutes when conducting construction supervision; or the contractor fails to perform construction works according to the design drawing, to notify the project owner thereof; and the contractor shall not, upon receiving a request for correction or reconstruction from

Nevertheless, on June 19, 2017, the Defendant requested correction and reconstruction due to the risk of safety accidents due to the lack of safety measures from the construction supervisor D architect office in charge of a construction project and the failure to perform construction works in accordance with the land excavation plan, at the place described in the preceding paragraph.

Since it is evident that Article 10 subparag. 5 and Article 25 subparag. 3 of the Building Act punishs a construction contractor who has received a request for correction or reconstruction from a construction supervisor and failed to comply with such request, the facts charged should be organized as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant (the date of the second public trial shall be the date);

1. E.