Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendant (appointed party) and the designated parties listed in the annexed sheet are all dismissed.
2...
Reasons
1. The Plaintiff’s Intervenor B, C, D, E, and F (hereinafter “Appointed”) served in G prison as a correctional officer belonging to the Defendant (Appointed Party B and four others), and the Defendant (Appointed Party) is an employer who supervises and supervises the Appointed B and four others.
On June 3, 2015, 08:30 on June 3, 2015, the Appointor B expressed the Plaintiff’s desire at the official room in G prison to the effect that “the Plaintiff resisted against the person working in charge of sending the factory he wanted to go to the NA in one room,” and the Plaintiff’s face at the left part of the Plaintiff’s face, and the Selection C took a serious verbal abuse. The Selection, D, E, and F took a son’s instructions and carried out a guidance, protection belt, etc. against the Plaintiff. At the same time, the Selection B, et al. and four others were sent to the Plaintiff for about 20 minutes, and the Plaintiff did not receive proper treatment and external medical treatment.
The Plaintiff was unable to receive such unlawful assault, verbal abuse, etc. as above, and four others, thereby causing injury to knee-free knee-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free kne-free.
Therefore, the Appointed B and four others are directly illegal acts against the Plaintiff, and the Defendant (Appointed Party) bears the employer’s responsibility as an employer who should supervise and supervise the Appointed B and four others. As such, the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the Appointed B and four others are jointly and severally liable to pay the solatium amounting to KRW 50 million (i.e., KRW 20 million for lost income loss amounting to KRW 30 million) and damages for delay.
2. Determination
A. According to the absence of dispute between the parties, or according to the result of the commission of part of the physical examination of Gap evidence 3 (including the paper number; hereinafter the same shall apply), Eul evidence 3, and the H Hospital funeral of this court, the plaintiff was punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to three years and six months, etc. and for the crime of forging private documents at the Ulsan District Court on June 28, 2013.