logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.22 2016가단5053032
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly share the Plaintiff A with KRW 200,000, KRW 1,000,000 to Plaintiff B, and each of the said money on June 1, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. In order to provide citizens of Seoul Metropolitan Government with opportunities to experience and educate English culture in the English sphere, the Defendant established the Seoul English Village Oil Camp (hereinafter “Water Camp”) in 43, Gangseo-gu, Seoul. Pursuant to the Seoul Metropolitan Government Ordinance on Entrustment of Administrative Affairs to the Private Sector (hereinafter “Defendant Company”), the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Ordinance on Entrustment of Administrative Affairs, which entered into an agreement on the operation and management of a hydrogen Camp with the Defendant Company and entrusted its operation and management to the Defendant Company, and instructed and supervised its operation.

B. From March 20, 2015 to December 22, 2015, the Defendant Company, under the supervision of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, held the “instant program with a schedule of 2015 for elementary school students at a swimming camp (hereinafter “instant program”), and Plaintiff B (D) participated in the said program.

C. After the completion of the aforementioned program, Plaintiff B was scheduled to return home to the Seodaemun-gu Office by getting out the Seodaemun-gu Office bus operated by the Defendant Company and getting out of it. However, an employee participating in the event of the Defendant Company was sent to the Seongbuk-gu Office around 13:30 on March 22, 2015 by mistakenly burning Plaintiff B on the Seongbuk-gu office bus.

Plaintiff

A, at the time of the above time, the mother of Plaintiff B was waiting for the transfer of Plaintiff B at the Seodaemun-gu Office around the above time, and was called from Plaintiff B that he could not find the horse from Plaintiff B, and requested Plaintiff B to inquire into the same situation as that of the bus wrong by contacting employees of Defendant Company’s event progress.

E. After checking the situation, the employees of the Defendant Company found Plaintiff B who was left alone in Seongbuk-gu Office at around 13:50, and found the Plaintiff B with the Plaintiff’s Seodaemun-gu Office on a taxi along with the Plaintiff B transferred the Plaintiff A or the Plaintiff B.

c) above:

paragraphs (e) through (e)

'the accident of this case' is called ‘the accident of this case'.

F. The plaintiff B showed symptoms that are uneasy and uneasy due to the aftermath of the above case.

arrow