All appeals are dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to the grounds for appeal by Defendant A and B, the lower court affirmed the first instance judgment convicting the said Defendants of the instant charges on the grounds that: (a) the Defendants A and B led the facility workers who applied for work on holidays to leave without permission; (b) thereby obstructing the factory operation of the victim H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim Co., Ltd”) by force with the facility workers; and (c) it is difficult to deem the said Defendants’ act to constitute a justifiable act.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s determination is justifiable.

In so doing, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the requirements for establishment of a crime of interference with business by force, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the elements for establishment of a crime of interference with business by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

2. As to the grounds for appeal by Defendant C, the lower court affirmed the first instance judgment convicting the Defendant of the instant charges on the ground that, on the grounds stated in its reasoning, the lower court acknowledged that Defendant C interfered with the business of the victim company by preventing the entry of its employees, along with the members of the metal labor union I branch of the Korean Democratic Trade Union Federation, as well as the members of the N company.

The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and the evidence duly admitted, the lower court’s determination is justifiable.

In so doing, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the requirements for establishment of a crime of interference with business by force, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the elements for establishment of a crime of interference with business by failing to exhaust all necessary deliberations, as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.