logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.09.27 2017고단1533
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 14, 2015, the Defendant entered into a sales contract with Seongbuk-gu E site and commercial building located in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, with a total of KRW 4.1 billion between D and D.

The Defendant registered as a rental business operator and received bank loans with the above land and buildings as collateral, and subsequently, intended to reduce transfer income tax at the time of selling the above land and buildings, the Defendant prepared a so-called business-up contract with the sales price of 4.9 billion won in total without obtaining the above D’s consent, and intended to submit it to the tax office.

1. On May 27, 2015, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) at the G Authorized Broker Office located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-gu, Seoul, by using a computer in the column where the land for real estate sale and purchase is indicated; (b) in the column where the land for real estate transaction is indicated, “Seoul-gu, Sungnam-gu, Incheon; (c)” in the area column; (d) “315.9 square meters”; (e)” in the structure column; (e) “the steel reinforced concrete structure”; (e) “the KRW 490,00,000 (Won )”; (e)” in the contract deposit column; (e) “the KRW 300,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,” and (e) on May 11, 2015; and (e) the seller’s name “Seoul-do,” signing-do’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising rights and obligations, the Defendant forged a copy of the real estate sale contract in the name of D.

2. On May 28, 2015, the Defendant: (a) filed an application for the registration of a business operator in the Sungnam Tax Office located in the name of the Defendant at the Sungnam Tax Office, which wishes to revise the Sungnam City, around 480; and (b) held the forged commercial building agreement as if it was duly formed with a public official in the name of the said tax office who was aware of the forged fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. The defendant;

arrow