logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원여주지원 2020.01.15 2019가단57003
토지인도 등 청구의 소
Text

1. The defendant is described in the separate sheet No. 2 attached to the real estate list No. 1 listed in the separate sheet to the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 11, 2007, the Plaintiff leased (hereinafter “instant lease”) real estate listed in No. 1 of the [Attachment List No. 1 (hereinafter “instant real estate”) to the Defendant by setting a lease period of one year for lease (hereinafter “instant lease”).

The instant lease agreement was implicitly renewed, and on May 29, 2018, the Plaintiff notified the Defendant of the termination of the instant lease agreement without setting a period.

B. At present, each of the facilities listed in No. 2 of the separate sheet No. 2 owned by the Defendant (hereinafter “each of the facilities of this case”) is located on the ground of the real estate of this case, and its status is as indicated in the separate sheet and photograph.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 2, 3, 8 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the facts of recognition under Paragraph (1) of the judgment on the cause of claim, the instant lease agreement was lawfully terminated after six months from May 29, 2018, upon which the Plaintiff notified the termination, and thus, the Defendant is obligated to remove each of the instant facilities on the ground of the instant real estate and deliver the instant real estate to the Plaintiff.

3. In conclusion, each of the plaintiff's claims is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow