logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.08.07 2018고단1954
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 13, 2014, the Defendant entered into a lease contract for the said apartment on a deposit basis with his mother, Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, 5405 and 2001, and the F entered into a contract for the extension of the lease period with the F and the lease period to July 29, 2017, when the lease period expires on December 30, 2016.

Around May 25, 2017, the Defendant concluded a contract to sell the above apartment to G, and received the balance of the purchase price until August 31, 2017. However, when the maturity of the lease period with the above FF is D and the deposit amount of KRW 350 million has to be returned to F until July 2017, the Defendant agreed to pay the remainder of the purchase price. However, the Defendant purchased the apartment through I, which was scheduled to move into the apartment, around June 28, 2017, through the victim JJ and K, which was scheduled to move into the apartment, and to receive money from the said victims in the name of the lease deposit and return the deposit to the existing lessee.

On June 28, 2017, the Defendant, through L, etc., a real estate intermediary operating the I, would pay the above victims the money as the gold for the return of the deposit for the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease of the lease.

“A false representation was made.”

However, even if the Defendant received money from the victims, it was thought that it will be used as the source of investment in futures option derivatives. At that time, the Defendant’s investment in futures was in a state of remaining balance equivalent to approximately KRW 30 million in the Defendant’s futures investment account. Since the above investment did not set the upper limit of profit and loss, the Defendant would have high risk of investment. Therefore, the Defendant would return the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the deposit of the former lessee to the F and the victims.

arrow