logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2015.09.17 2015고단1190
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 15, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the credit branch of the Suwon District Court for six months. On November 15, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of eight million won for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the home branch of the Chuncheon District Court.

1. Around 04:10 on June 10, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven a car in Crocco with a blood alcohol concentration of about 0.211% in a section of approximately 1.4 kilometers from the roads near the Seongbuk-gu Seongbuk-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu to the roads in front of the same distance for framework of the reimbursement.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a car in Crocland.

On June 10, 2015, at around 04:10, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol as described in paragraph 1, proceeded with the intersection of the indemnity frame in the Sung-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-si at a speed from the string distance to the sloping distance.

At night, a person engaged in driving service of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to accurately operate the steering system, brakes and other devices of the motor vehicle, not to drive the motor vehicle at such a speed or in such a manner as may interfere with others depending on the traffic conditions, the structure and performance of the motor vehicle, and to ensure that the driver has a duty of care to safely report the traffic situation and prevent accidents in advance.

Nevertheless, under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was negligent in driving the Defendant’s vehicle at the right-hand part of the victim’s DNA driving, which was left left to the left at the right-hand part of the Defendant’s car.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not immediately stop and take necessary measures despite the damage of the victim’s property by negligence on the part of the victim’s left-hand door and the penter part of the penter part.

arrow