logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.02.06 2017나52971
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff’s assertion and determination of the Plaintiff asserted that the Defendant had a duty to pay KRW 9,952,00 to the Plaintiff, since the Defendant performed the stone construction work from among the new commercial construction works located in Daejeon Daejeon, on November 2015. However, the wage claim statement (Evidence A2) cannot be used as evidence because there is no evidence to prove the authenticity, and it is insufficient to acknowledge the fact that the Defendant was a contractor of the above stone construction work or the said construction work amount reaches the amount of the Plaintiff’s assertion. The Plaintiff’s assertion is without merit, since there is no evidence to prove otherwise.

2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim shall be dismissed for lack of reasonable grounds.

The judgment of the first instance is just in conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow