A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is not a motor device bicycle because the engine displacement exceeds 125 cc of a two-wheeled automobile displacement of 300 cc GX 1300 R 1,300 cc.

is a person engaged in driving service.

1. On April 25, 2014, the Defendant was driving the said two-wheeled vehicle without a driver’s license on April 21, 2014, which led the Defendant to drive the said two-wheeled vehicle, and the Defendant was driving the said two-wheeled vehicle on the side of the second line road in front of the Young-gu Office in the Young-gu Office in Busan Metropolitan City.

In such a case, since there is a road where a center line is installed, it is possible to drive the road along the right line and not to drive the center line, while it is due to occupational negligence going beyond the center line, the part left by the victim F in front of the passenger car in the middle of the said two-wheeled passenger car owned by the victim F, which was driven by E along the one lane of the opposite vehicle in the middle of the said two-wheeled vehicle, was destroyed to the left side of the said two-wheeled vehicle, and the repair cost is damaged to the extent that it is worth KRW 1,554,428, and the driver immediately stopped

2. On April 25, 2014, at around 22:29, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (refluence of the noise measurement) without justifiable grounds, even though there were reasonable grounds to recognize that the Defendant was driving under the influence of alcohol, such as a climatic distance, in the office of the traffic accident investigation department of the Busan Young-do Police Station located in the Busan Young-do Police Station, and caused a traffic accident by driving as referred to in paragraph (1) from a slope H affiliated with the Busan Young-do Police Station, and the Defendant was unable to properly hold the body of the Defendant’s entrance, and the Defendant was requested to comply with the alcohol measurement by inserting about 26 minutes in a clibing measuring instrument.

3. The Defendant received a flagrant offender with the same content as the Defendant’s paragraph (1) at the time and place of paragraph (2) of this Article, and the Defendant transferred the case to the person in charge of the traffic accident.