1. The acquisition amount of the non-party B by the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2006Ka7249 (including the correction of the Decision 2007Kaman396).

1. According to Gap evidence No. 2, according to the facts based on which the defendant attached each of the items listed in the attachment list in the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 35 floors on November 23, 2015 (hereinafter “instant compulsory execution”), based on the original copy of the payment order stated in the order of the payment order stated in B.

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff asserts that since each of the articles listed in the separate attachment list 1, 2, and 4 (hereinafter "each of the articles of this case") is the articles owned by the plaintiff, compulsory execution against them should be denied.

As to this, the defendant shall operate the goods of this case by B and work for the plaintiff.

The retired hospital asserts that the articles used in the hospital business are currently being used in the hospital and are not owned by the plaintiff.

B. Comprehensively taking account of the respective descriptions of evidence Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5 as well as the overall purport of the pleadings, the Plaintiff recognized that each of the instant objects was knocked in the corporeal movables seizure case No. 2009No. 7990 of the Seoul Central District Court on Nov. 17, 2009, and the descriptions of evidence No. 1 are insufficient to reverse it, and there is no counter-proof otherwise.

Therefore, compulsory execution of this case shall not be permitted only to each of the goods of this case.

3. The plaintiff's claim for conclusion is reasonable, and it is so decided as per Disposition.