Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was between the victim C (V, 51 years old) and the legal couple. On October 18, 2016, the Defendant was living separately around October 2016.

1. On October 18, 2016, the Defendant 13:30 to 14:05, and without good cause, found the Defendant to drink at the south-gu D victim’s house in Yanananan-gu, Nam-gu, South-gu, Seoul, and found it.

In doing so, with the view of “to throw away by death,” a golf, which is a dangerous object, bening the event at several times with the home attached to the event and sticking the knick, which is a dangerous object in the water supply, on the floor, and threatening the victim as they inflict any harm on the victim.

2. The Defendant, as described in paragraph 1, threatened the victim and returned thereto, found the victim’s house in a state of drinking around 18:30 on the same day, and saw the victim’s drinking again, and knicks (12 cm in total length on the day, 12 cm in front of the passenger car operation group owned by the Defendant), which are dangerous articles kept in custody in the Defendant’s E-car operation group, putting them into a hand at a newspaper, and put them into a brush, and embling the victim’s body, and threatened the victim’s life.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The legal statement of the witness C;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Voluntary submission, protocol of seizure, list of seizure and evidence of seizure (the defendant and defense counsel) are asserted as follows:

First of all, the defendant in relation to Paragraph 1 of the crime is "C" at the time

It is the fact that he did not take a bath that he would die, or did not stick his knife his knife on the floor, and there was no manif at that time.

In addition, the crime No. 2 was related to the crime No. 2, which did not bench per event, but did not have any desire, and there was no intention of intimidation.

section 3.

The victim C submitted not only a written application for punishment to the effect that he does not want the punishment of the defendant after the date stated in the facts constituting the crime, but also a statement was made in the direction favorable to the defendant by reconciliation with the defendant at the time of testimony in this court. Therefore, the witness C who has such attitude in this court is guilty.