logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2017.01.12 2015고단5252
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

When the Defendant filed an application for “B” patent and completed the registration of “B” date, (registration number D), and also, the Defendant was willing to send a postal item requesting the Victim H to suspend the manufacture of “F” product “F,” which is a decomposable product, to the victim H, and to file a complaint with the victim H, who is the actual operator of the Plaintiff H, for the violation of the Patent Act, if the Defendant did not comply with the request.

1. On August 11, 2014, in the Yeongdeungpo-gu Postal Service Office located near the Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan City, the Defendant: (a) “L products filed a product declaration at Egypt and prepared for withdrawal from Egyptian, contain “E extraction water F” as their principal ingredients; (b) this material contains patent substances at the headquarters, and seriously infringes on the patent rights of the headquarters; (c) the Defendant notified the Kgypt Co., Ltd., the manufacturer of the patent infringement on August 6, 2014; (d) however, no measures have been taken; and (e) contact was made.

Return did not have concluded any contract with the head office with respect to this patent, so “M” and “L”, which currently prepares for the release of products, infringes upon the patent rights of the head office.

The mail was sent with content proof that the preparation work should be suspended at the time of the release of the product, or that “E extraction F” should be excluded from raw materials, and if not supported, the head office shall not take civil or criminal measures.

However, in fact, the defendant was working as a director of the victim H H in the process of serving as the director of the victim H in the process of operating from around 2001 to 2006, and the victim H in the process of operating a business of "F" has been manufacturing the product containing "F" from August 2007, 207, which was before the defendant registered a patent with C in the process of registering a patent with C, so it is not a violation of the victim H in the process of operating the victim H or the actual operator, etc.

arrow