The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although the Defendant misunderstanding the fact was flabing the victim’s flab, the Defendant did not enjoy the victim’s chest with knee.

Therefore, the judgment of the court below which found the defendant guilty of the crime of injury is erroneous by misunderstanding the facts, which affected the conclusion of the judgment, even though the victim's assault did not have a knee in knee, knee, knee, s

B. The sentence of the lower court (one million won in penalty) that is unfair in sentencing is too unreasonable.

2. Judgment on the assertion of mistake of facts

A. On March 15, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 14:50 on March 15, 2015, the Defendant placed knee knee knee knee knee knee, knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne kne knee knee knee knee knee kne

B. The lower court also denied the same purport as the grounds for appeal, but the lower court convicted the Defendant of the instant facts charged on the grounds that the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly admitted and investigated:

The victim made a statement to the effect that it conforms to the criminal facts stated in the investigation agency and this court.

However, there is a very concrete and consistent statement, and there is no particular contradiction between many statements, as well as the credibility of each statement of D, F and G, which has been witness, is high.

In general, the injury diagnosis report submitted by the victim of the crime of injury is that the doctor grasps the cause of the injury on the basis of the victim's statement and specifies the part and degree of the injury observed and judged by mobilization of medical professional knowledge, and the injury as stated above is the defendant's person.