Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The Defendant, within around 10:50 on February 15, 2018, committed assault on the part of the victim’s cell phone with the cell phone owned by the Defendant and his spouse at around 10:50, the sound of the Olympic Film C, which was viewed as a mobile phone by the Defendant and his spouse, was flick, and the victim D (45 years, south) was flicked at the victim’s cell phone.
2. Determination
(a) Crimes of non-violation of intention: Article 260(3) and (1) of the Criminal Act;
B. On July 31, 2018, after the prosecution of this case, a non-application for punishment was submitted to the effect that the injured person does not wish to punish the accused.
(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;