The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who is in a marital relationship with the victim D, and two persons are currently in a divorce lawsuit.

In the early stage of pregnancy, the defendant was faced with the crisis of divorce, and it was called to erase the victim's abortion clearly.

If the warning is neglected, he would be flicker, but he would have been flicked, so he would have been flickly flicked.

sent text messages, such as ‘A’ to the victim

On May 6, 2017, around 09:40 on May 6, 2017, the issue of divorce and abortion in the Seo-gu Incheon, Seo-gu, Incheon is a punishment for a dispute with the victim on divorce and abortions, etc., and the defendant's hand when the victim's hand is clicked with the victim's "blick before facing one another."

Before the death of one and two lux, the lux and two lux were the lux before the death. The lux of this lux is the lux of this lux.

Accordingly, the Defendant assaulted the victim as above, resulting in blood transfusions from which the victim could not know the number of days of treatment.

2. Determination

(a) Evidence proving that the injured person suffered an injury shall be reported, including a letter of complaint filed in D, a police statement of D with respect to the police (45 pages of the evidence record), photographs (Evidence No. 45 pages), each injury diagnosis document (No. 46 pages, 190 pages of the evidence record), a medical expenses account statement (No. 47 pages of the evidence record), hearing the victim's statement about the injured part and degree, and a report on the attachment of the medical certificate submitted by the complainant.

D At an investigative agency, it is true that the defendant had been scleeped with a sclock from the defendant and the inside of the defendant had been scleeped with a sclock for the use of the mouth.

was stated.

However, according to the evidence No. 1 of the defendant's submission, D stated that the facts in the written application for withdrawal of complaint and non-guilty punishment did not lead to the entrance, and that it was minor to the extent that it did not take medicines.

Therefore, the statements made in the investigation agency of D cannot be trusted.

In the mouth of the injury diagnosis report (Evidence No. 190 page).