1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the parts to be filled or added below, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The third 4 pages of the judgment of the first instance court is used as "the first instance court", and the fifth 5th "the result of the request for the appraisal of medical records" is added "the result of the inquiry into the G Hospital Head of this court".

After the fourth two pages of the judgment of the first instance, “There is no evidence to acknowledge the fact that he was on credit on the part of the injury of this case while he was working for the Plaintiff.”

Then, after the 4th 11th day of the judgment of the first instance, the court's appraisal as to the fact inquiry of this court is presented on the premise that "the plaintiff works as coal, digging, mountain and auxiliary workers, as in the first instance trial, in the Korea Coal Corporation's mining and other mining establishments from 1969 to 16 March 2009."

"in addition".

2. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.