Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,500,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On October 16, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 14:00 of Daejeon Seodong Btel 617, the Defendant: (b) borrowed a steel company with a discount fee of KRW 120,000,000,000 issued by the listed company to obtain a discount by presenting it to the steel company. (c) If the Defendant borrowed a steel company with a discount fee of KRW 10,000,000,000 from the steel company, the Defendant would receive and sell it and pay it four days later.
The phrase “ makes a false statement.”
However, in fact, it is not necessary to charge a discount on a bill, and the defendant requested the said discount on October 8, 2014 by the said listed company on the request of the said listed company for a discount on the said promissory note, and on October 8, 2014, the above listed company was urged to pay the discount, and thus, the above listed company was receiving a demand for the payment of the discount from the said listed company. Therefore, upon receiving the delivery of KRW 10 million from the victim, the above listed company was considered to pay the discount to the said company.
In addition, the above steel company had already been supplied with steel instead of discount money, and thus there was no intention or ability to pay for it even if it borrowed money from the injured party.
The Defendant received KRW 10 million from the damaged party to the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant.
As above, the Defendant was given property by deceiving the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Application of the police statement protocol law to C
1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment;
1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;
1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act shall be determined as per the order, taking into consideration the fact that the defendant has repaid 500,000 won to the victim.