logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2017.10.20 2017고단1203
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes) by the Defendant is a person engaging in driving a car with B car.

On May 20, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 16:00 and proceeded ahead of the old elementary school, which is located at the awning of the awning at the awning of the awning.

At this point, there is no distinction between the roadway and India. Since there is a place where pedestrians are frequent, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving the vehicle safely by accurately manipulating the front door and the left door and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and found the victim C(74 tax) who was faced with the negligence of proceeding as it was late, and had the right edge of the victim with the front wheels of the above car.

Ultimately, even though the Defendant suffered from an injury, such as a dysium dysium, etc., for about four weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence, the Defendant immediately stopped and escaped without taking measures, such as providing relief to the injured party.

2. Defendant 1 continued to drive and drive the said vehicle continuously after committing the crime set forth in the above paragraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act (e.g., drinking refusal) and had the said vehicle set up on D neighboring roads at the summer time, and had the police officers dispatched to the said place for questioning about the crime set forth in the above paragraph 1.

In the process, the defendant was driven while under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling from the defendant and sprinking red on the face.

There is a reasonable reason to designate a person, who is demanded four times to respond to the measurement of drinking by inserting the breath of the police box F from May 20, 2017 to May 18:02 of the same day, by inserting the breath of the police box, from May 20, 2017 to May 20, 201.

Nevertheless, the defendant has a drinking measuring instrument.

arrow