logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2018.06.21 2017고단2660
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On July 2016, C intended to obtain a loan in the name of the victim D, which is the defendant's will and to obtain the loan by fraud.

Accordingly, on July 13, 2016, the Defendant: (a) expressed that “the Defendant was unable to obtain a loan due to delinquency in receiving the loan from a person who wants to do so; (b) borrowed only in the name of the head of the Tong so that he can obtain the loan because he/she was old; (c) upon entering the head of the Tong, only deposit shall be made within the head of the Tong; and (d) upon deposit of KRW 30 million from the F bank to the E-association account in the name of the victim, the Defendant called the victim who was aware of the fact that the loan was granted in the name of the victim; and (d) called the victim who was aware of the fact that the loan was granted in the name of the victim, and then made the loan in the name of four names.

D. In other words, C was able to make a loan under the name of the party, and C was able to make a loan under the name of the party at the time when C was aware that the loan was made under the name of the party.

Madna, Madra.

It is the complete payment.

will be made by means of a letter.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, since the above loans amounted to KRW 30 million under the name of the victim, not C, not C, and therefore, the part stated in each of the above notes stating that “a loan was received in the future C, and the loan amount was deposited to DC account with KRW 30,00,000,00,000, and the loan amount was disposed of to DC,” was false, and the defendant and C were unable to fully pay the loan amounting to approximately KRW 580,000,000,000 with a certain source of income at the time, and C did not have any intention or ability to pay the above loan amounting to KRW 38,00,000,000,000,0000 to KRW 38,000,000,000,000,000,000 from the damaged person, even if they were transferred to the victim under the name of the loan amount.

Nevertheless, it is not appropriate.

arrow