1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is the owner of the entire building located on the ground (hereinafter “instant building”) as the National Assembly of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government.

On February 25, 2002, the Plaintiff leased to the Defendant a deposit of KRW 30,00,000, rent of KRW 1,177,00 (Additional Tax), and one year for a contract term of KRW 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,7,8, and 1 of the attached Form No. 1 (A), which are part of the third floor of the instant building (A) of the instant building, to the Defendant in sequence of each point of (a) the attached Form No. 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8, and 159.41m2 (hereinafter “the leased part of the instant third floor”). The lease was renewed every year with the condition that the rent is settled or increased.

Rent for the lease deposit for the object of contract date: (a) the lease deposit for the third floor of this case from February 25, 2015 to February 24, 2016; (b) KRW 1,300,000 on February 30, 2016 to February 24, 2016; and (c) KRW 1,300,000 on the lease deposit for the object

B. The main contents of the lease agreement concluded on February 25, 2015 following the renewal of the said lease agreement are as follows.

(1) On December 1, 2015, the rental deposit charges for the lease deposit for the object of contract (hereinafter “the initial contract”). The lease charges for the lease deposit for the object of contract for the third and second floors of this case from December 1, 2015 to November 30, 2017, KRW 2,000,000 (Additional tax is separately imposed)

C. However, on December 1, 2015, the Plaintiff and the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the following terms, such as adding part of the second floor (A) of the instant building to the leased object (hereinafter “instant second floor lease”).

(hereinafter “instant contract”). D.

On August 10, 2017, the Plaintiff demanded that the Defendant deliver the instant contract by the day on which the period of the lease expires. Accordingly, on September 5, 2017, the Defendant demanded the Plaintiff to renew the instant contract in accordance with Article 10 of the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act (hereinafter “Act”).

E. The defendant continues to lease the three floors and the two floors of this case even after the expiration of the lease term of this case.