The judgment below

Part of the defendant's case against the defendant A.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Defendant and the person who requested an attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) for the following reasons: (a) Defendant and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) on the ground of misunderstanding of facts or misunderstanding

(A) Although A did not interfere with each of the crimes described in this part of the facts charged, the lower court found the victims guilty of this part of the facts charged by misapprehending the legal doctrine. (A) Each of the statements made by the victim G, I, and J concerning the violation of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (Indecent Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse) is inconsistent, as well as inconsistent with the objective facts; and (2) each of the statements made by the victim K and P concerning the indecent act of indecent act by compulsion is inconsistent with the empirical rule and objective facts; and (3) each of the statements made by the Z and the Z and the Defendant B, in light of the empirical rule and objective facts; and (4) the credibility of each of the statements made by the victim J and S concerning the act of assault

나) 강제추행 불성립 ⑴ 설령 피고인 A이 피해자 G, I, J의 각 성기를 만졌다고 하더라도, 이러한 행위가 강제추행의 폭행에 해당한다고 볼 수 없다. ⑵ 또한, 피고인 A이 피해자 K의 무릎을 베고 눕거나 팔꿈치로 가슴 부분을 꾹 누르고 피해자 P의 팔을 쓰다듬고 옷 위로 가슴을 만졌다고 하더라도, 이러한 행위가 강제추행의 폭행에 해당한다고 볼 수 없고 추행이라고 보기도 어렵다. 2) 양형부당 피고인 A에 대한 원심의 선고 형량(벌금 40,000,000원 등)이 너무 무거워서 부당하다.

B. As to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (13 years of age or minor indecent act by compulsion), unlike the victim V investigation agency, Defendant A’s wearing clothes at the time of committing the crime by making a statement to the effect that “the defendant A had received clothes at the time” in the court of the original instance unlike the victim V investigation agency.