1. All appeals filed by the Defendant and the Intervenor are dismissed.

2. The portion resulting from the participation in the appeal costs.

(b) give and receive entertainment from the representative of the Plaintiff’s partner company in a transaction-friendly relationship by having the partner company representatives pay the golf cost;

Unauthorized absence or absence from office (the ground for disciplinary action No. 4) The intervenor was absent from office without permission for two weeks from the first time of November 2015, and the worker was absent from office without permission or late attendance from office on December 1, 2015. (A) The details of each of the grounds for disciplinary action of this case are as follows. (b) The Plaintiff’s Disciplinary Committee on February 11, 2016, by e-mail, referred to as “the notice of holding the standing committee and confirmation of the intention to explain” (hereinafter referred to as “the notice of holding the standing committee”) as follows to the upper committee as a result of the audit by the audit team recently conducted.

The Monetary Punishment Committee shall be held as follows:

* Temporary: February 18, 2016 (b) 14:00 to 17:00 places: The office of the 17th floor management conference of the J building * The office of the J building : The case is whether the 17th floor management conference room of the J building is present at the meeting by February 16, 201 after preparing explanatory materials where the act of misconduct in the development and construction sector and the act of proving the responsibility for management and insolvency is desired.

(hereinafter omitted).

C) The Intervenor shall investigate the Plaintiff’s Audit Team (hereinafter “instant audit”).

(D) On February 26, 2016, the Intervenor did not appear at the Plaintiff’s Disciplinary Committee on the grounds that the Plaintiff made a statement, and the Plaintiff’s Disciplinary Committee decided to dismiss the Intervenor as of February 29, 2016 on the grounds of each of the instant disciplinary reasons, and notified the Plaintiff of the date immediately following the date.) On February 26, 2016, the Intervenor filed a request for reexamination on the dismissal of the instant case with the purport that the Plaintiff’s detailed statement of each of the instant disciplinary reasons was denied.

An intervenor is present at the Appeal and Punishment Committee held on March 4, 2016 and vindicates the grounds for each of the instant disciplinary reasons.