beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B’s KRW 43,795,102 and interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from August 11, 2016 to the date of full payment.
Reasons
Basic Facts
The Seoul High Court Decision 2012Na42903 decided June 3, 2009, which was the case of destruction and transmission of the land rent claim for the H building in Yongsan-gu Seoul, which was brought against G and two other 23 persons, (hereinafter “related litigation case”), ruled against the Defendant in the Seoul Central District Court Decision 2008Gadan220825 decided November 3, 2009, and the Seoul High Court Decision 2009Na59604 decided November 25, 2010, which was reversed and remanded to the effect that the Defendant lost by the Supreme Court Decision 2010Da108210 decided May 24, 2012.
With respect to the relevant litigation case, 20 persons among the defendants of the relevant litigation case including the defendants of this case (hereinafter referred to as "the clients of this case") submitted a letter of delegation and present arguments, and at the end of the new facts and legal arguments that the plaintiff could win without being contrary to the purport of the Supreme Court's judgment of reversal and return, the clients of this case represented by the plaintiff, and the remaining defendants of the relevant litigation case that the plaintiff did not represent, were sentenced to August 23, 2013, and the judgment against which the plaintiff lost was finalized by the Supreme Court Decision 2013Da71340 Decided June 23, 2016.
On August 20, 2012, J, a member of the I church, among the Defendants of the relevant litigation, discussed the relevant litigation case with the other clients by entrusting the relevant litigation case to the Plaintiff, and concluded a contract with the Plaintiff on behalf of the clients of the instant case on August 20, 2012 on behalf of the clients of the instant case, the retainer fee was set at KRW 44,00,000 (the retainer fee was set together with the other co-owned property partition case, which is the relevant litigation case and the other co-owned property partition case, including value added tax), and the contingent fee was set at KRW 550,00,00 (which is related litigation case, including value added tax), and the contingent fee was set at KRW 50,00,00 (which is included in value added
(hereinafter “instant case acceptance agreement”). The Defendants are all family members and Defendant C.